![]() This term is used in both criminal and civil cases before the court. He can do this on his own or with the assistance of a lawyer In a civil court the burden is on the claimant to prove his case. In the Magistrate court, police prosecutors have the duty of proving cases. The DPP and other prosecutors in his department are trained lawyers and they follow similar procedure in dealing with matters. He has the duty of proving a criminal case in the High court. There is a Director of Prosecution, who is better known by the acronym DPP. It is the prosecution that has the burden of proof in criminal matters in the Magistrate Court and the High Court. In our jurisdiction the burden of proof is different in criminal court to that in a civil court. The court system has standard procedures and relies on tried principles, which have served it well and proven to be reliable. A haphazard system with vague terms can only lead to uncertainty and lack of trust. Consistency is a way of making sure that there is no unfairness and that parties can have confidence in the court. These are helpful constructs and are used in every case before the court, thus allowing the court to operate in the same way for everyone. For example, both criminal and civil laws speak to a burden of proof and a standard of proof. There are many tools that are used to make the law operate almost like a science. We both subscribed to the common law and many of our procedures are similar. The law is fairly settled in SVG and is similar in many ways to the British model from which most of our laws come. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |